Showing posts with label eventing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label eventing. Show all posts

Sunday, March 21, 2021

Why Clinicians Ask For Videos

 

 


Participation in a clinic can be an expensive enterprise, especially if the clinician is a higher profile equestrian with a proven competition career at advanced levels. Prospective riders that show interest in securing a slot to partake of the event experience are sometimes baffled by why they are asked to send a recent video of a schooling session with their horse, some folks are even offended.

Just why do clinicians request a video before agreeing to teach a rider?


 

The answer is it's different for everyone. Each clinician has their own set of reasons based on their professional experience, but here are some common reasons for the request:

Is Your Horse Sound? 

It's sad and somewhat amazing to say that sometimes even trainers don't seem to notice, or care to notice, that their student's mount is behaving badly due to a soundness issue.

Unfortunately, the clinician is faced with a difficult situation when this occurs. As horse folks themselves, for clinicians the horse's well-being is always their top priority. When a rider/horse combo enters the arena and the clinician can clearly see that the horse is in discomfort or even pain, the only compassionate thing to do is address the issue, which necessarily sincerely upsets the local trainer and/or the rider. The often anxious, slightly nervous and keen rider has invested financially to participate in the event, and has also expended emotionally with much hard work to prepare for the opportunity to ride in the clinic. No clinician likes to be faced with this issue.

By requesting prospective participating riders that are interested in the clinic submit a recent schooling video, the soundness of the horse can be evaluated. The viewing of the video is not about offering a veterinary opinion, it is about sharing the wealth of knowledge that the clinician probably has on the matter of soundness for task, and giving a 'heads up' to folks that might not be aware of the reason why the horse is not performing to its full potential. This information gives the rider time to have their horse evaluated by a qualified medical professional before the clinic so that issues that may be present can be addressed before the rider commits to a spend on the clinic ride.

It is ultimately the clinician that is responsible for the welfare of the horse and rider in front of them, morally at a minimum and even legally in some States and circumstances. Thus it is understandable that the clinician wishes to see beforehand that the horse and rider are 'good to go.' 

 



What Benefit Will The Clinic Provide To The Auditors?

Many clinicians have guidelines as to the rider's level of training and their horse's age/level of accomplishment that they require for participation in a select event. This is especially common when a large gathering of auditors is anticipated. 

The idea being that the horse/rider combinations need to be at a stage in their training where corrections and instruction given can be taken on board and executed, to showcase to not just themselves, but also to the paying audience to educate as to how the correct training can quickly progress the horse to a more advanced level. A learning opportunity for all. 

For certain clinicians this can be vanity based, as they do not wish to be presented with a horse and rider they are unable to help improve in front of the public. 


 

What Benefit Will The Clinic Provide To The Entrant?

If a clinician is offering a specified topic at their event as is often the case, then the horse and rider will only benefit from that particular clinic if they are at a stage in their training where they are ready both physically and mentally to advance.

For example, if a jumping clinician is offering a clinic to aid riders deal with jumping a course of spread fences/oxers or water jumps, there is little point in a novice rider/horse combo showing up. Similarly a dressage clinician that is offering a clinic on collection and lateral work will not be able to instruct a rider on this topic if they don't have an independent seat and their horse has not attained the prerequisites of basic dressage.

A first hand view of a video ride will allow the clinician to evaluate whether horse and/or rider will benefit and are ready for what is intended to be taught at the event.

As a rider paying good money for help from an expert in their chosen discipline, this is surely an advantage? If the clinician does not feel that you are ready for the work or if your horse is not at the level of training to address the requests that would be made of it, surely it is better to know before you get in the ring?

Take Home Message

Don't be offended if a clinician requests a video before slotting you into a clinic. It does not mean they are not offering to teach all that want to participate, especially if it is an open clinic with no topic specified. It just means they want to be sure horse and rider are fit for the task.

If the clinic is specifically geared to a certain level of training or if the event is more a symposium than a clinic, then expect that the horse/rider will need to submit a short video of themselves at work, so that their talents can be evaluated as far as readiness for the task they will be addressing training wise.

Everyone, including the barn host, local trainer, riders and clinician should want the best possible experience for the participating riders and their horses. 

Unfortunately many trainers make plenty of pre-clinic prep lesson money from their students and can sometimes be blind to the fact they are over-schooling or pushing the horse, even to the point that the sudden increase in work can cause a previously sound horse to become sore and resistant. 

This is an inconvenient truth that experienced clinicians see all too often. Hence the requirement for video submission is more commonly requested by the experienced clinicians than those just starting out in their careers.




 



 



 

Sunday, September 27, 2020

When Equestrian Press Calls Out

The stand Eventing Nation {EN} recently took regarding their contention and action to have the name of the event Plantation Field removed from the competition due to its claimed offensive undertones, made the national news cycle including the NY Times. Contentious rhetoric and actions ensued. 

The owner of the property pulled the lease rather than change the name of the event, which has been on the calendar as a recognized competition for 20 years; Olympic rider Boyd Martin, requested publicly that his image and name be removed from any press at the publication; other publications brandished their swords alongside EN and the equestrian populace came out to voice either their support or boycott of EN and its owner brand and advertisers. 

So in theory September 2020 was the last time equestrians will be invited to gallop along at this fixture, at least as it is now called.

The pulling of media credentials from Eventing Nation's Editor by the competition's management, as a result of the publication's article, was not the first time access has been denied at an event to press as punishment for speaking out and certainly it will not be the last. 


 

I have personally experienced similar access issues to eventing competitions, although in my case for no apparent reason. The property owner that hosted a major cross-country event that cancelled recently after a good run in Dutchess County was extremely hesitant to allow me to cover the competition for this magazine, Catskill Horse. In that case the statement 'came down' to me that I would be allowed to cover the event provided I kept a low profile and did not publish anything negative about the sport of eventing or the competition. I did not attend.

I am not going to delve into the wrongs or rights or moral grounds for the Plantation Field controversy, except to say it could have been better handled better by all parties. The timing of the article and the way the conversation was approached was certainly designed for maximum impact.

I do believe that elitism in equestrian sport, whether perceived or actual, needs to go and that governing entities need to do a better job of developing an inclusive environment for everyone. 

In my opinion the boycott of a publication or company for its views is somewhat inevitable, as in my experience people like to read and hear thoughts and ideas they agree with better than those that challenge their mindsets. That is human nature I suppose. It is a sad reality though. How can we improve life for all when we are afraid to think no further than our own frame of reference and education.

Of course as a publisher and a writer I believe free press is critically important to society and that voicing an opinion or bringing to light options for improving life for all is an essential component of a media professional's job. It was the driving force that guided me to start writing professionally back in 1981, covering events for The Chronicle of The Horse and penning 'how to' articles for the now defunct, Dressage and CT. 

 


 

I also fervently believe that facts should be the guiding principle in all writing, not under researched or ill-informed and errant statements used to promote ignorance or create tensions or unrest.

Media professionals will always be the subject of retaliation. Sometimes petty instances and histrionics but sometimes severe consequences can follow publication of their works.

For event management press is usually highly sought and much desired. It boosts not just the entries and attendance at a competition, it also brings much needed numbers of 'eyes' on the valuable sponsors participation that most venues require to operate. Event planners, hosts and management work hard to bring equestrian competitions to the public eye and try endlessly to support the sport to keep it on the Olympic calendar. Their task is not an easy one by any means.

 



The expression, " All press is good press," is something to think about. I am a PR/Marketing Specialist and in my experience for smaller brands this is the case. For larger brands perhaps not so much. Glean.info covers this topic beautifully. For equestrian events, in particular the dangerous sport of combined training, press can cast an unwanted spotlight on issues with death and disasters on course. Reticence to allow open press access to events held on private property is understandable if the event management team is concerned about a journalist highlighting a negative aspect of the competition, even if it is factual and accurately illuminated.

The name of a venue is a challenging thing to adapt, not least because of the historical factor that may be inherent in the place name. Whether that name be perceived as a negative or positive attribute is a societal moral issue. 

One thing is certain, the freedom of the press to report and do their job is an essential part of the conversation. However, the author must be certain of their facts before they hit send and the topic could have easily been discussed as Boyd Martin's official press suggested, "over a cup of coffee," and after the event had concluded, not just in advance of its date.

Photo Credits: Nikki Alvin-Smith